Which of the current ship models would you remove from CF?

There are 22 replies in this Thread. The last Post () by magnet.

  • Which of the current ship models would you remove from CF?
    (based on the look not on the stats)

    signew.jpg


    cfmoddblogo.png5904.png5904.png
    http://www.moddb.com/scripts/topsite.php?ts=4766


    Only dead fish swim with the stream.
    Don't discuss with idiots. They only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience there.


    This is ten percent luck,
    Twenty percent skill,
    Fifteen percent concentrated power of will,
    Five percent pleasure,
    Fifty percent pain,
    And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!

  • Is it neccessary to remove ships?
    :(


    Click the image above to visit us.
    _______________________________________
    "Sir, we are surrounded!"
    "Excellent, now we can attack in any direction."

  • the SL ships will stay in CF
    im just asking because i might replace other ships with better looking versions

    signew.jpg


    cfmoddblogo.png5904.png5904.png
    http://www.moddb.com/scripts/topsite.php?ts=4766


    Only dead fish swim with the stream.
    Don't discuss with idiots. They only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience there.


    This is ten percent luck,
    Twenty percent skill,
    Fifteen percent concentrated power of will,
    Five percent pleasure,
    Fifty percent pain,
    And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!

  • OK Op, I just said which ships I don't like cause you asked :). I'd personaly prefer none ships to be removed, because there might be people who'd like some of them and I am quite sure there are people who like some of these models.


    CF Chars: SMG_Simba, Simba[ServerPolice], SMG_Panthera_Leo, SMG_Kovu, SMG_Smilodon, SMG_Nimravus, SMG_Megantereon, SMG_Hoplophoneus, SMG_Ginsburgsmilus, SMG_Paramachairodus, SMG_Lokontailurus, SMG_LZ129_Hindenburg, SMG_Sponsored_By:_Puma, SMG_LZ127-Graf_Zeppelin


    SMG Forums

  • Bullpups (all 3 of them - especially Mk3) -- they don't fit and mk3 is just plain ugly (especially with the green monkey face on it's behind) :)

    <table border="0" align="center" width="75%" height="40px" cellspacing="0"><tr>
    <td align="left" background="http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/9442/swatwj7.png" width="2px"></td>
    <td valign="top" align="center" width="100%" background="http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/401/swatya1.gif"><font face="serif" color="white" size="5">&#191;&#647;&#592;&#653;&#387;&#592;&#623; - magwat?</font></td>
    <td align="right" background="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6025/swatright.png" width="2px"></td>
    </tr></table>
    <!--<hr width="85%" />

    Fix'd.

    -->

  • Mostly the ships that are alien designs (Hydra, Starskipper, etc.), and ships that are really ugly (King Tiger, Devastator, Serafina, Devil Ray, Nexus, Scourge, Shifter, V-Fighter, etc.). Some of the remaining ships could be modified to have the unique funtions of the deleted ships, like dual-CM-launchers (from the Serafina) for instance. The list is pretty long, so I'll have to do some research to be more precise... 8)

    My rig: i3-4130 Core Duo (3.4Ghz), Gigabit GA-B85-HD3 mobo, 8Gb PC1600ram, Samsung 2x 80Gb SATA RAID, Intel Integrated graphics, 3 optical drives, 23" Asus HD monitor + peripherals


    Character names: Centaurian_Alpha & CA derivatives
    Founder: Independent Operators' Consortium (established 2006)

  • Ok.. here's my list..


    Kossac
    Kamov
    Nexus
    Shifter Proto-type 1
    Basilisk
    Azan


    and the ugliest one of all..


    Seething Fury


    (it looks like a 1970s render..lol..besides this one always gets stuck docking at stations)


    ;)


    SMG_Mizibelle, SMG_Spellcaster, SMG_Hellcat


    “Being a mercenary... Hey, we just go wherever there's a mixture of money and trouble, and everyone in the galaxy is a potential customer."

  • no way - SF looks kickass! :D

    <table border="0" align="center" width="75%" height="40px" cellspacing="0"><tr>
    <td align="left" background="http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/9442/swatwj7.png" width="2px"></td>
    <td valign="top" align="center" width="100%" background="http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/401/swatya1.gif"><font face="serif" color="white" size="5">&#191;&#647;&#592;&#653;&#387;&#592;&#623; - magwat?</font></td>
    <td align="right" background="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6025/swatright.png" width="2px"></td>
    </tr></table>
    <!--<hr width="85%" />

    Fix'd.

    -->

  • [9]


    SMG_Mizibelle, SMG_Spellcaster, SMG_Hellcat


    “Being a mercenary... Hey, we just go wherever there's a mixture of money and trouble, and everyone in the galaxy is a potential customer."

  • I'll suggest to erase/replace all ships that are never/no more been used by players. Most vanilla ships are no more used, is it necessary to keep them all ? Idem for some weapons we never use anymore.

  • better suggestion -- encourage players to use them. I, for example, use the Red Eagle (almost vanilla) and 2 vanilla weapons (+ no missiles) so ... ;)


    What we need is Vanilla-like weapon specialization -- a shieldbuster (tizona in vanilla), a low-power gun w/ uber refire rate, a slow and slow-refiring Cannonlike thing etc etc. Cos now atm we've got like 2 guns (PPC and DKA) everyone uses and they are almost the same (only difference is minor change in power use)

    <table border="0" align="center" width="75%" height="40px" cellspacing="0"><tr>
    <td align="left" background="http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/9442/swatwj7.png" width="2px"></td>
    <td valign="top" align="center" width="100%" background="http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/401/swatya1.gif"><font face="serif" color="white" size="5">&#191;&#647;&#592;&#653;&#387;&#592;&#623; - magwat?</font></td>
    <td align="right" background="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6025/swatright.png" width="2px"></td>
    </tr></table>
    <!--<hr width="85%" />

    Fix'd.

    -->

  • That Mirage X in Vega.... looks awful.

    Previous names: PiA_astatic, MW-astatic, [UAC]Ryzune


    EVE Online: Xiang Chi, Caldari Achura


    It's better to be rich and depressed than poor and depressed!


  • Quote

    Originally posted by magnet
    better suggestion -- encourage players to use them. I, for example, use the Red Eagle (almost vanilla) and 2 vanilla weapons (+ no missiles) so ... ;)


    What we need is Vanilla-like weapon specialization -- a shieldbuster (tizona in vanilla), a low-power gun w/ uber refire rate, a slow and slow-refiring Cannonlike thing etc etc. Cos now atm we've got like 2 guns (PPC and DKA) everyone uses and they are almost the same (only difference is minor change in power use)


    What he said. With the price of the VHFs so high, it discourages 'trying one on for size' just because it looks cool. It's not an issue for people who have been running a train for a year and a half, but for noobs and relative noobs the price tag can be a little daunting, so we try to research the 'best one' and go for that.


    Plus, with so many of them burried in clan systems it can be hard to even SEE some models outside of single player. Certainly a gem like the Shroud should belong to the people who pay for the system, but maybe some of the more 'average' ships could be moved somewhere more communal, like maybe Wheel of Sirius?


    Noob sits down and shuts up now.

    Hmmm...more zombies than usual...

  • True. But the Shroud sucks nowadays, everyone uses the Lagg :)


    *Edit* Except me, I use a Wolverine. Turns like a block of flats, but I was obsessed with the firepower it had on SL ^^

    Previous names: PiA_astatic, MW-astatic, [UAC]Ryzune


    EVE Online: Xiang Chi, Caldari Achura


    It's better to be rich and depressed than poor and depressed!


  • Its great the variety of ships offered in CF, but its also true that after all, specially in the last months everybody use laggs, maybe tweaking some stats to make ships a bit more similar will give players the chance to take care of the "cool" or "beautifull" desing of the model, and variety will grow in CF. (wich i consider that it will be really great)

  • Quote

    Originally posted by Tito
    to make ships a bit more similar


    I think that what we need is more variety. If there's a ship w/ 2x thrusters, maybe there could be one w/ no thrusters :D if there's a really fast fighter (lagg or eagle), let there be a really slow fighter (but not a freighter) etc etc.

    <table border="0" align="center" width="75%" height="40px" cellspacing="0"><tr>
    <td align="left" background="http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/9442/swatwj7.png" width="2px"></td>
    <td valign="top" align="center" width="100%" background="http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/401/swatya1.gif"><font face="serif" color="white" size="5">&#191;&#647;&#592;&#653;&#387;&#592;&#623; - magwat?</font></td>
    <td align="right" background="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6025/swatright.png" width="2px"></td>
    </tr></table>
    <!--<hr width="85%" />

    Fix'd.

    -->

  • Maybe were looking at this from the wrong side .... find the best ships .. or the most popular .. and take them out of game .. Everyone would have to hunt round for the for the next best class ..