[extrabox]bongart
hemebond
panzer225
franky_lee2000
quel fake
Trainwiz modder
Sizer modder
lennake
JinxVanAshke fake
I_am_Stranger fake/flak88
4Aces
preethm20 fake
Death-Rain TRF member
Pastaspace modder
iamtheone
Kaden.Cruz modder
Sirius2 Discovery player
Giggily modder
RIP-Soupman modder
rgriffin modder
Bubb9
Dragnite_MU modder
bizzyfizzy fake
xcheeseontoastx modder
Etaphreven modder
Gibbon modder
Pleskot fake
TSP-FriendlyFire modder
Ruppetus modder
CKYRules modder
Ichtan fake
Filzinhu fake
Don_Zardeone ex-section leader of SWAT (removed by me)
ww2jacob modder[/extrabox]
Since I have these small moddb rating buttons in my signature I got a bit curious about the mod rating again. For a very long time I ignored this topic due to the fact that Crossfire is one of the best rated mods at moddb. From the general rating overview it came to my attention that either people love the mod or they hate it... there is not that much between these 2 extremes.
Hmm... well...
Good ratings dont require that much attention but bad ratings do.
The above names represent the people which gave the worst possible rating to my mod.
OK. Everyone has an own opinion and the right to voice it... that is absolutely ok. I am not blaming anyone for it.
I can understand why [TRF]Death_Rain gave such a voting after unpleasant events in the community (mostly my fault), I can understand why Don_Zardeone was angry when I had to make a difficult decision and after the (meanwhile settled) disagreements with panzer225 I am also able to see where this rating comes from.
"bongart" gave a pretty interesting feedback which I take very serious. He/she is btw. the only one giving a real feedback based on experience with the mod and its community.
In the above list you see a few comments after the names.
That is what really bothers and worries me.
Crossfire received 34 negative ratings (I am just refering to the worst possible vote).
15 of these 34 votes come from other FL Modders. 8 of these votes belong to fake accounts (which probably also belong to FL modders).... I clearly can say fake accounts because their obvious purpose was to downrate the mod... they were registered and never used since then... no activity in other areas... not even enough online time to download the mod... no active email accounts.
Motivation of such votes can not be an objective opinion on the done work and the quality of the mod.
Motivations probably varii.
I could now say "this one comes from this mod and the other one comes from that community" and "things were done to cause harm" but throwing with stones while sitting in the glasshouse never was a good idea. I just consider it sad to see such stuff happening in the Freelancer community... and it did happen on most FL mod profiles.
Such stuff does not harm a particular mod... it harms the entire FL community since every mod is part of it.
It is sad to see that most negative votes on the FL Mod profiles were done by modders of other FL mod projects. Very likely many of them have not even played the mod in order to do a fair and objective vote.
Just like other modders I am a player aswell.
Not every mod got a high voting from me... many mods got relative low votings at the beginning and better ones with increasing quality of later mod versions. Some mods got no voting since I did not play them or because I could not make an objective vote at all. In a very few cases I decided against voting or removed it long ago because - eventhough it represents my opinion - it would have caused harm to the project and the FL community.
Am I totally wrong with that?
Should I probably re-think my views... maybe even return the favour?
Id like to get your opinion on this topic... what do you think?