Aera 51's Cammo Dudes and the rumored TR-3B, UFO's/ETV and the secrets of Anti-Gravity

soz to say, but some of the videos, like the "Could antimatter destroy Earth? " are stupid... you don't need an Earth size antimatter ball.... if 1g of it is more than a ton of dynamite, a simple ball of basketball size is enough to destroy half earth and the race on it, no need of more

Quote from Michael

soz to say, but some of the videos, like the "Could antimatter destroy Earth? " are stupid... you don't need an Earth size antimatter ball.... if 1g of it is more than a ton of dynamite, a simple ball of basketball size is enough to destroy half earth and the race on it, no need of more

that depends where on earth it explodes

however i have to revise my previous statement about element 117
it has been created, the info was released in april this year
it was more stable than other heavy elements but not stable enough to make use of it

Regarding the anti-gravitational field. The Ancient maya had some "flying-boats" called Manas if i am not wrong. Proof is that this kind of technology isn't very hard to achieve, it was lost in time, but if the modern scientists find a more practical then theoretical way to create this kind of tech, the humankind can proceed it's Conquest of Space.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw9-ZaoCG5A

This is a small clip showing a method of interstellar travel that can save our great problem in space. Regarding that Star Trek is just a sci-fi movie, the Warp technology can be very real. Imagine a bubble with the capacity of compressing space-time in front and expanding space-time behind it.

And also regarding the Anti-matter .. in the near future, humans can develop ways to use Antimatter as a prime energy source. Still a gram of antimatter in the entire world, isn't a good start, but progress is made day by day. Remember that the Japanese created the first fusion reactor. It was stable for some minutes, but produced 10.000 megawatts power !

http://science.discovery.com/v…nce-using-antimatter.html

hehe faste than speed of light Thats only math ans theoretically calculated. If two object depart from each other with the speed of light than the difference between both is twice the speed of light Isn't that beautiful math^^

accelerating to the speed of light is possible. and has always been done (LHC). But with very light weights. The mass of the object increases heavily if its accelerated and also its lenght is increased so heavy and large object might get instable during such "warpings"... I am sure this will take the humans another century to get it working - at least in the way we know it from star trek or other sci-fi movies

@Synkron

Quote

Imagine a bubble with the capacity of compressing space-time in front and expanding space-time IN IT

it's what that plasma superfluid accelerator does, as the video arround the beggining explains, it makes a kind of field arround it making it's own athmosphere with different laws..., reduces Earth(the main one with a graviation field, then sun and others) Earth's gravity field by 90 %.... the same with the rest of weaker fields ofc.

And about making a fussion reactor, it's the same way as the superfluid accelerator, at school I did about the fussion reactor but on video it's showing the same stuff with another material inside(instead of plasma, a superfluid), the thing it is possible, you can jsut not believe it cus it's not something normal, as your brain "think" about it and say it's impossible, but with no proof against Like telling if you drop a ball it fall upside(instead of falling down, on the floor) it's irrational for your(anyone's) brain, but if you'd be on the moon it'd be possible if Earth is above.

Huor
you forget about Einsten's relativity.
nothing overpass teh light speed in their point of view, in your point of view it looks different pending on the movement directions, time compression and stuff... well... sounds as irrational as a real thing, that a sun unstable particle that gets created by the defraction of light in Earth's athmosphere(you know, few big photon get split in something smaller with a very short life), and that particle only has 0.1 miliseconds life, and needs 0.3 ms to hit Earth's surface, so it can't hit it, but it does !! In our point of view it lives the 0.3 ms, but in the particle's point of view it only lived 0.1 and hit the earth.

At least it's a real particle with a real story(unless it isn't 0.3 but 0.22 or other numbers, but the same issue) and real cientific calculations, that my teacher shown us

Like in the LHCollider, the subatomic particles, hadrons, for our point of view they get more mass and energy while they get more and more speed(well same like photons when they get to light speed as they have 0 mass while being static), so more mass and harder to turn arround in a circle(they had probs with that issue a while that it changes mass) but in particle's point of view it just makes more space/distance travel in shorter time for us...
Also that's why they accelerated the stuff only to 99.999999(x12)8 % light speed.... with nearer it goes, more energy they have to put on the particle... and with an infinite big mass they need up to infinite energy.... and never get to light seed. Stuff that goes to infinite sux, but it's nice with photons as they have pure 0 mass while static, but they do have a small mass while at light speed.... so 0 x infinite = x (any number except 0 )

0 x ∞ = 42 --> didnt someone wrote about it already ;D

Hydrogen cars as mininukes... hmm

look in the past at the begginings of cars with combustion motor... there were cars which explode right in middle of people(with going normally, no hit or crash)... but it got perfectioned, and nothing wrong happened with them until now... except when somebody destroy the car and add some sparks or fire. If they simply destroy the car(in present) with n ospark or fire, they don't blow Still , they CAN blow pretty strong heh.

hydrogen or something else, teh danger will be bigger, but also perfectioned

The speed of light can't be achieved at 100% only overtaken. And the technology of superfluids will be possible in a similar way for the next 50-100 years i believe... only if the super-powers don't quit their quest for weaponry and send all information in research