You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowSign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new account
There are 31 replies in this Thread. The last Post () by SWAT_OP-R8R.
QuoteDisplay MoreOriginally posted by Zoomer
Wow, who'd have guessed! Another thread about "Oh they're all bad, attacking me"... and without evidence too
There is no evidence, it is all based on heresy and claims here are subjective.
As Swat would say "it's a fact" - yes, it is a fact. He doesn't know - he thinks, but remember his opinion is highly subjective, and that doesn't make it true
Allright then who do YOU think can be the suspect?
Oh because it is as coincidence that, after Op replied and defended his position on RF, 15 mins later the SWAT portal was "down", same with CF?
QuoteDisplay MoreOriginally posted by Zoomer
Wow, who'd have guessed! Another thread about "Oh they're all bad, attacking me"... and without evidence too
There is no evidence, it is all based on heresy and claims here are subjective.
As Swat would say "it's a fact" - yes, it is a fact. He doesn't know - he thinks, but remember his opinion is highly subjective, and that doesn't make it true
No you are wrong! We dont claim its a fact but we weighten the obvious.
An example for you:
Several sites got attacked about the recent time, TSP even had to close its doors under those attacks. As soon as TSP had closed its doors SWAT was the aim of the attacks. And just as all this happens you have found a thread on RF saying that they are protected. Very suspicious... Wondering that sites got attacked, RF is safe (what they are not - not more like other sites). Its also very suspicious that they wanted to help TSP to offer them a host. Strange as its cleary an aim of RF to get more and more popular, so one of their competitors just under their services...
Furthermore the behaiour on RF didnt changed very much. The admins are closing threads and are willed to delete stuff just because they cannot stand the facts (imo).
And as all this is not yet enough - a moderator from RF was saying that he is neither living in UK nor US. Why should he just say something like this (in the conses of the attacks that were ongoing on SWAT at that moment). Why he mentioned only US and UK - did he knew that the attacks could be tracked back to those countries? And if yes - where he could knew of this -> if you ask me -> very suspicious.
And due to the history at RF (former TLR) the most know what they are capable of. Azza and Knife were protected. One of those who (officially on IRC or chats) stated that they attacked sites...
All in all very suspicious and if they can claim they are protected - we can claim that they have a dept on all the attacks.
I am not aware of Reactorforge having/housing/sheltering either Azza or Knife.
Are they being sheltered there? Are they part of ReactorForge?
As for why would Reactorforge claim they're not susceptible to attacks when others endure them - that much is easy, with a little analogy if you indulge it 
In the UK, during a cold snap last winter, several councils publicly said on the news that they were running out of Grit/Salt for the roads. At the same time, several other councils publicly announced that they had sufficient supplies to see them through. Did this mean councils were stealing from each other? No. It is a way of reassuring your community that you are capable and have sufficient resources that the same will not befall you.
I'm not saying that is why they created the thread - but is this not a plausible explanation? If so, then the thread is circumstantial with regards to the attacks, and not an indicator of being behind them!
Furthermore, with regards to who else is behind it? I've received a spam email today from lancersreactor.org - where it appears Azza and Knife are running the old Lancersreactor again.
So this is confusing as you claim RF is the old TLR? Or do you just refer to those who used to run it before any troubles, and those who ran it more recently?
My question is therefore - which sites are definitely run by known hackers? Which sites have definite proof to be involved in hack attacks? Lastly, when attacked by Azza previously - did the attack originate from one IP address? If so, it is quite easy to mitigate that - most server software provides a method of doing so, if you can configure it. Or are the attacks distributed ones - utilising "Zombie" pc's? An answer to that may indicate how people may claim they're "not susceptible", which translates to "we're competent and know how to configure a server".
Anyway, with Azza/Knife back in the frame (question is, were they ever out of it?), perhaps you can have 2 suspects? Or do you think they're working together? (if they are, then why buy/bring back lancersreactor.org?)
QuoteDisplay MoreLancersreactor.com is no longer the place to visit for lancersreactor we have
now moved to www.lancersreactor.org please update your bookmarks, webmasters
please update your links.
Lancersreactor.com has fallen to someone wishing to use the domain for some
profit making browser game totally unrelated to freelancer. Lancersreactor.org
is back up and running as it was before domain problem occurred.
Regards from the Lancersreactor team.
First they betray their master mentalchaos by trying to hand over TLR to RF and now they complain.
I guess i go and register a new domain (ie. lancersreactor.de) and call it the new official TLR 
why not - would be a start^^ and its not forbidden 
They are most likely the people that simply do not care about what befalls elsewhere, as long as they get what they want.
Whatever it is they want.
As for lancersreactor.de - 
Why not. my hosting plan allows me to register and host 2 domains for free. I only pay for first one which I already have.
