1923
It occurs to me that we'll never say 50,000 if we're counting by odds.
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowSign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountThere are 917 replies in this Thread. The last Post () by Husker.
1923
It occurs to me that we'll never say 50,000 if we're counting by odds.
what u say sounds odd to me...^^
1925
1927
1929
Have fun
1931
It occurs to me that we'll never say 50,000 if we're counting by odds.
What ? you don't know that 50'000 was orginally an odd number ? it's because there were two 49'999 (twins) and two 50'001 in the great birth of numbers, so you should count 2 times 49'999 making 50'000 and odd number at that moment and everythign was balanced with the 2 50'001s.... Some theorists suggested that methematicians hid one of the each twin numbers at an early age to avoid screwing the whole math science.... they were both divided by zero (executed) to save the life of all mathematicians... there is also 1² that has double personality... it seems those number dudes are all crazy people !
1933
1935
At least we get to make a lot of posts to get a higher rank lolz im 65 points away from getting the Lituenant rank so i dont mind
1939
silly me - i always thought i do this for entertainment...
1941
1943
we're so lonely here that we don't count pair numbers, just unpair ones lol
1945 rofl
1947
1949
1951
1953
1957
1959
Elvis Presley era
QuoteFor all you math nerds out there, try this one on for size!
e^(i * π) + 1 = 0
Regarding the almost mystical relation: e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 (there really
is no debate). It is REAL number.
1961