I think that we are mostly in agreement, Michael. Let's see whether we can fine-tune the thoughts a little, ok?:
Quote
Originally posted by Michael
There are more than 2 Threads made to announce Crossfire 1.81
The above is an example of what I meant about using references or pointers to other threads and messages. When you provide a link to the threads that you discuss, then a statement such as yours is helpful. Without the link, it just appears as though you are being defensive without having an actual point.
I'm not trying to be difficult... just hear me out:
I only see one thread matching your description: CF1.8>1.81. That thread was created while OP was still discussing whether or not he would have further updates and whether or not updates would happen through the launcher. Unless I missed something, his final word on the subject was "all updates will happen through the launcher". OK, so maybe he meant "all updates AFTER 1.81" but that is another example of my point about the tendency toward not communicating clearly that I see often here.
The point that I am trying to make is that, even though the CF1.8>1.81 thread has the correct solution, it is anything but clear when taken in context with the other threads posted around that date.
Another way of saying it is this: There is a LOT of noise on this board, and the actual content can be difficult to find.
Please do not take any of this personally or think that I am complaining -- In fact, I think that you are one of the better communicators around here. I am only using your remark as an example, for clarification. I hope that is "OK" with you!
Quote
Originally posted by Michael
Also, in your suggestions, I notice much spoiling.
True.
As you know, I am fairly new here, and I try to follow examples set by others, who (including you) have given out more "complete solution spoilers" than I have. I try to give only hints. Nevertheless, as you point out, even the hints should be clearly marked and posted in the Freelancer Spoilers Forum.
I just figured out how the Spoiler button works (thanks, Arrow!) so I will use that, as well.
Quote
Originally posted by Michael
Would you play the something you already memorized again and again like a game cards with one combination(or the same puzzle) ? I don't think so.
Right, exactly!
That is one of the reasons that I never took much interest in MP games. After meeting a few people, it is all the same. I get a lot more "workout" and more variation in gameplay in SP by varying the challenges.
I would be much more interested in an MP game that allowed for a little more variation. Perhaps a controlled amount of cheating, rather than the strict no-cheating policy? (And, no, I do not have a suggestion for how to implement that!) 
As an analogy, I have always been more interested in rallying (leaders in both technology and style) than in the International Race of Champions (IROC), where all cars have identical preparation. While I can see a certain "pure" elegance in IROC, I find more entertainment in watching a good game of tennis!
But I also think that MP games are amazing technology and are terrific for those who enjoy them.
That is why we have choices.
Regarding the launcher issue, I will try again with 1.81. Thank you for that suggestion!