ASF/CSF rules suggestion

There are 26 replies in this Thread. The last Post () by Corp.

  • Im willing to go with the all freighters exluded from fighting deal. Will make things simpler.


    as for the single defender rule.


    I say a system can be invaded only two or more defenders are on line. if invasion takes place a defence must me mounted. If no defence mounted after a specific time like 30 mins or an Hour then the system is forfited to the invaders.

    Hey Guys..I got this Xeno on the ru..*zzzt*..:End Transmission: :P


    !!Danger!! Volitale Gasses Detected!!....DUDE!!! At Proxima I said "LEAVE THE CHILLI ALONE!!!"


    (\__/)
    (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
    (" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.

  • There are many trade routes ,but how much money do you really need ?
    I havent traded in ages after working my butt off ,and i lost a store char with 500 mill equip.
    I have about 400mill between my chars its enough to fight for a long time
    Trains are a target as they would be in real life and NB is ASF at moment ,if that changes well there u go :)


    Chasman ,I could come online and take all CSF sectors when u are offline then its over and we start again.
    Not much point that way tho
    The idea is for us to be fighting for what we want and want to protect

  • Time period is a suggestion to keep the fighting going. otherwise we could wait until no onw around and just walts in and claim the system. For a system to be taken it must be defended. if defenders are on line then they will be forced to defend it. If they choose not to. then no one will defend systems if it means they wont loose them due to not defending.

    Hey Guys..I got this Xeno on the ru..*zzzt*..:End Transmission: :P


    !!Danger!! Volitale Gasses Detected!!....DUDE!!! At Proxima I said "LEAVE THE CHILLI ALONE!!!"


    (\__/)
    (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
    (" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.

  • a refusal to fight can happen and did happen in NB. Its not BG-Streamers fault either but when the attack started there where 2 BG members online and in NB with trains. They then resparned in Cutsodian and came back to NB. Next thing that happened was ex BG_ Shu left and only Streamer was on. The fight had already started so should both of them stayed on to fight? As it was Streamer could not beat 6 of us and did not come back to NB. and i must say i dont blame him dont think i would have come back with them odds.

    carbine[CFPD]

  • Quote

    Originally posted by carbine60
    a refusal to fight can happen and did happen in NB. Its not BG-Streamers fault either but when the attack started there where 2 BG members online and in NB with trains. They then resparned in Cutsodian and came back to NB. Next thing that happened was ex BG_ Shu left and only Streamer was on. The fight had already started so should both of them stayed on to fight? As it was Streamer could not beat 6 of us and did not come back to NB. and i must say i dont blame him dont think i would have come back with them odds.


    shu doesnt count
    BG_streamer is only 1 figher - min is 2 for 1 side

    I don't fear anything.
    [SIZE=1] - Remy Bonjasky[/SIZE]



    [SIZE=1]AMD64 X2 4200+ | 1024 RAM | 9700 GS | MSI K8N SLI Platinum, nForce4 SLI | 1,2 TB | 22"CRT | FL@1280x960x32bit@xxx fps | XP with SP2 [/SIZE]


    Freelancer Videos: [ Movie 1 ][ Movie 2 ][ Movie 3 ]

  • Quote

    Originally posted by Laurent
    Did you think about a "champion" fight...
    Each side choising a champion and after x kills the winner get the system ?


    So all the brave knights can return safely at home with his family, ok, then what we do playing a war, or the game is to stand still watching a singular pvp? :P


    Rules, rules ... whats the problem with a fight like the ones we had on those wars, fighting and fighting till one side gives up? It was great.