Search Results

dunno, one does the balls the other does the streamone is used by battleship turrets, the other by destroyer turretsbut that is not important the only thing that is important to me is that its the original setting... its how it is meant to be

i will not change it since it is not the original effectit was never designed for that purpose

humans will not build better weapons

it was secret... until it was discovered

as requested, missions against Coalition Rogues and their solars

well, i am doing and 1.1 mill mission on an indestructible starflyer

good thing ... i did not even write that

Modular Coalition Station test:(7 of 19 modules active during this test)

i probably would name it "station"

hmm forget the stuff with the coalition... huor just had a better idea for it (dunno yet if possible)

*cough* psst... that was just an idea

since almost everything gets reviewed for CF2.0 every single asteroid field gets an updateMission zones and all bases are already reviewed and changed if necessary CF2.0 will come with some major changes and +10.000 detail changesThis should give you a slight impression why the development takes such long.

i should take money from PC manufacturers

why dont you kill the fighter before it kills you?hey... im just thinking out of the box

.

.

i dont think so

Here a few images from some of the system changes... custodian and tarsus system (so far)You might notice that we kept the structure of the system basically as it was while doing detail improvements.Planets got some moons... there are construction sites for new stations... improved station complexes, battleships returning to stations for repairs, buoys warning the player or marking special areas, improved station textures, weapon platforms guarding stations or important objects (such as communi…

Replacement for the A9fx Hunterswat-portal.com/forum/wcf/attachment/764/Freelancer 2012-10-27 12-59-18-13.png

and it is not possible to fix it... aswell as we are not going to add dockable battleships