Search Results

One could just use the widescreen support of that dll - without the rest - as you are one of the 10 people in the world - you might know what i mean ;D

(Quote from Bullwinkle) Have suggested the same already If you want a feature disabled the easiest is to comment it out and built that dll again ;D

Just a sentence for TSP: I visit it quite often - perhaps i can learn something from there. I don't know what is going on there behind the curtains and i am not interested - but i fairly respect what other contribute there too. FlHooking related and improving game graphics and other stuff is always good - no matter if it looks good afterwards or not. All that count on me is that the person who dealt with a particular topic has learned something for themselves. About the rest - what was once upo…

jflp is working on the clients. I tested it - the only thing i was not able to test is and was the widescreen support. But as far i didnt changed anything on that piece of code i wouldnt see any reason it should not work. I compiled the dll in VS2010 for X86 systems - as FL is not for x64 systems its useless to compile it for x64. going to have a look at it in debug mode. hope to figure out whats wrong if its not working. The current version is the AC version although it not named AC - as there…

the more it test the better There are other stuff that jflp.dll is including what i will tell when i have time. As the other stuff is working and the widescreen thingy not than i have no clue why - because like i told i didnt changed any code for the widescreen support and i didnt changed anything else on the other features. So it really could be that the values in the cameras.ini file have to be set to 0. <<< would need confirmation and so far the more it would try to verify the better...

its ok bullwinkle. I am also really busy these days in RL - so hence not much mood to do coding in the evening hours when i am doing that all the day long And i guess we wont have a result until tomorrow. So when you are in the mood and have time to test it and you didnt found a result here than test it. If not then not. You are not forced to waste valuable time same as i am not forced to do so and OP is not forced to do so. So when we have the time and resources to solve it it will be done. If…

thanks Bullwinkel - when i am back at full health i will have a look into this. Currently i not in the mood to do any coding Damn autumn