Search Results

imho: 1. option 3 should really b just a backup plan, since it requires a wide deal of different server admins support, which could prove impossible and time consuming. we should work on it everyday, but create a long-term plan for this option, with good guidance, or it will just prove time-consuming and nothing else. 2. option 1 is a must go! 3. option 2 should b done, but it may prove impossible, just as blaster suggested. if it is not possible, fallback to option 3, a backup plan. i would co…

if u can't try tlr's option policy in practice, without compromising other options and swat in general, then it is not a option, ofc. i just don't know what obligations they r forcing at the end, so i suggested it.

what do u think about W0dk4's workaround, op? is he trustful and could we use this solution as a starting base, or u like luova's replacement we host better for now?

my opinion is the same. i have just been loading tlr page (because it was offline for more than once in previous weeks, wanted to check if it does work), just to see there is no more cf banner on banner list, nor swat's logo. there's a link in forums to swat's forum (stating it as cf forum), but i haven't been able to find much more than that. ohhh, nvm, i'm not really gonna use tlr anymore.

gls open beta is out. more info.

r u gonna add cf and bu to it? just for advertising, nothing more...

ok... i didn't really check, but i might do it, just to b updated how they use it. will u add the change of the ini file to update files maybe, or include it in 1.8?i don't think they will manage to get dns entry, ofc. also, what do u think about this (read the desc)?