fire
Posts by Doc
-
-
pier 9
-
2055
-
butyric acid
-
100000000001
-
leather
-
kétezer negyvenhét
-
bullet
-
twinkle brothers - Babylon falling
-
2044
-
sexy time
-
a real spammer then heheheheheheheheeh[95] [203] [404] [835] [888] [968]
-
-
so is this official now?????
Predator is not on the "not wanted in RP list" anymore?
it would be nice to have some more opinions on this. some test results.
it is a ship from Neophobos so i dont know if Dopp is really objective on this matter


Gunny m8, what is ur opinion on this?
imo Predator does not take damage well in battle (may depend on many factors). i will not buy one!
-
Quote
Zitat:Originally posted by -=[T-R-F]=-/\-War-Cmdr.
MfG: -=[T-R-F]=-/\-War-Cmdr. alias -=[T-R-F]=-Demon-Knight
+(Fallen)~GIGANTULA~+ hehe!!what is the last part supposed to be ?
i was wondering about the same
-
this was not intended as a discussion thread about what is bugged and what not!!!!!
this is only the result of some serverside tests that were made with some ships!!
the results were that the 3 ships listed in the first post were somehow put into a bad light so we decided (and i mean many of us) that these ships should not be used in RP.i posted this once again because Flash and me wanted to avoid misunderstandings.
this is a short summary of old discussions about bugged ships. -
i think there was a post about this one somewhere but there it is again.
it looks like JoWood is the publisher so it might be out soon (few months)
there is the link to the homepage:
-
this list should provide an overview of ships that should not be used in RP because they do not take damage correctly!
u can call them banned if u like.
if there are any other ships there that were often enough tested and found bugged, u can post the names here and i will update this list!RELIANT (BS)
KARAK (F)
EDIT:
????? (PREDATOR (F)) ?????
-
kann mir nicht vorstellen dass jemand hetzt, aber es wäre echt interessant zu wissen wer Fallen anführt.
-
market