Search Results
Search results 1-4 of 4.
-
honestly having twice the information on two different subsystems is not a good idea. It makes maintenance only complicated.for my understanding the wiki is not so good implemented - especially the category system is terrible. A mediawiki for example would be much more comfortable (like wikipedia is using). The lexicon is quite OK and the categories are in place there. Thats just my impression.
-
dont understand why we should have redundant data available that needs twice the effort to maintain. Twice the effort to add, twice the effort to delete, twice the effort to review...The category system on the lexicon is a lot better than on the wiki and the wiki is just an article system. Like the entry from Ajay - Coalition Gatlin. Its a weapon but is just an article under C, but should be better in the category weapons. But instead there is just a link to the C category. Why not improve the …
-
i feared that such argument would fall. i am not all players i just dont like this wiki due to its bad category management - which must not mean anything at all. I suggested mediawiki because articles are easy to write, formatting is easy, category management is easy, references are easy, cross-linking is easy. It just gives many features. Well i am just more used to mediawiki cause i use it all day at work Surely it would mean double user management but there could have been a possibility that…