Major security flaw found in Intel processors

There are 3 replies in this Thread. The last Post () by SWAT_OP-R8R.

  • Security researchers have found serious vulnerabilities in chips made by Intel and other companies that if exploited could leave passwords and other sensitive data exposed.


    "Several researchers, including a member of Google's Project Zero team, found that a design technique used in chips from Intel, Arm and others could allow hackers to access data from the memory on your device. The problem impacts processors going back more than two decades and could let hackers access passwords, encryption keys or sensitive information open in applications," according to CNET.


    The discovery comes shortly after the chipmaker said it was working on a patch.


    In a statement released Wednesday, Intel acknowledged the problem, saying that it is "working closely with many other technology companies, including AMD, ARM Holdings and several operating system vendors, to develop an industry-wide approach to resolve this issue promptly and constructively. Intel has begun providing software and firmware updates to mitigate these exploits."


    Wired explains that the bug "... allows low-privilege processes to access memory in the computer's kernel, the machine's most privileged inner sanctum. Theoretical attacks that exploit that bug, based on quirks in shortcuts Intel has implemented for faster processing, could allow malicious software to spy deeply into other processes and data on the target computer or smartphone."


    According to The Associated Press:


    "Tech companies typically withhold details about security problems until fixes are available so that hackers wouldn't have a roadmap to exploit the flaws.


    But in this case, Intel was forced to disclose the problem Wednesday after British technology site The Register reported it, causing Intel's stock to fall."


    The Register reports that "Programmers are scrambling to overhaul the open-source Linux kernel's virtual memory system. Meanwhile, Microsoft is expected to publicly introduce the necessary changes to its Windows operating system in an upcoming Patch Tuesday: these changes were seeded to beta testers running fast-ring Windows Insider builds in November and December."


    The tech site added that, "Crucially, these updates to both Linux and Windows will incur a performance hit on Intel products."


    However, that is a claim that Intel disputes: "... any performance impacts are workload-dependent, and, for the average computer user, should not be significant and will be mitigated over time," the company says.


    Source




    So if you have a PC with an Intel CPU that was produced somewhen in the past 20 years there is a risk that it can get infected by malware using this flaw.
    Intel meanwhile responded and said that the CPUs are working as intended (denying any responsibility) but at the same time adviced all users to apply the upcoming patches for Windows and Linux.
    These Patches however come at the risk of slowing down your computer by up to 30%. That highly depends on the CPU generation, the workload and other factors such as the use of NVMe SSD drives. So far the performance loss on the newest Intel chips has been reported to be minimal for the average user. However the biggest performance loss so far has been recognized by systems using NVMe PCI SSD drives. These ultra fast drives get slowed down because the CPUs can no longer process the data fast enough.
    Games should not suffer noticable performance problems after these security patches.

    signew.jpg


    cfmoddblogo.png5904.png5904.png
    http://www.moddb.com/scripts/topsite.php?ts=4766


    Only dead fish swim with the stream.
    Don't discuss with idiots. They only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience there.


    This is ten percent luck,
    Twenty percent skill,
    Fifteen percent concentrated power of will,
    Five percent pleasure,
    Fifty percent pain,
    And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!

  • A short update on this topic.



    The two identified issues called Meltdown and Spectre are not only issues affecting Intel CPUs but also AMD.
    However, AMDs processor design allow software patches that have pretty much no impact on the performance.


    Intel however, has a hardware problem that can not be simply fixed by software. The solution to the problem is a workaround. One that uses additional calls to access the kernel. Unfortunatly this is what leads to the mentioned performance problems. 5-30% slower Intel CPUs were expected after the Linux/Windows updates in combination with a bios/uefi update.
    That of course depends on the workload and how you use your PC.
    During the past few days people have benchmarked the hell out of their systems, with and without the patch.
    Generally the 5% decrease in performance appears to be more realistic than 30%. However, it is still not 100% clear how representative these benchmarks are since they were only done on specific hardware (often latest generation of CPUs). Providing all across the board benchmarks might be tricky since it is not only windows that needs to be patched. Also the bios would require and update and providing bios updates to all the different kinds of mainboards throughout the past 10-20 years is not an easy task for the manufacturers (if they are even willing to do that).


    Biggest impact on all these currently available benchmarks had the SDD performance. The NVMe drives suffer an up to 40% performance loss after the patch.
    Thats a painful loss considering how expensive these drives are (especially the Pro versions). I am personally very glad that I only have a small 960 Evo. That one at least wasnt that expensive... and yeah... still after the 40% drop should be faster than the next best option.


    While gaming might not see a significant impact by these issues (maybe a few fps less) there might be a big impact on game servers.
    Epic Games Fortnite game server all of a sudden has a much higher CPU load after patching.


    EvE Online and multiple other server based applications released similar stats showing that all of a sudden their server loads increased after applying the patch.


    Generally I assume that Webservers, search engines, databases, etc. all over the world will have to face a big impact on their performance.

    signew.jpg


    cfmoddblogo.png5904.png5904.png
    http://www.moddb.com/scripts/topsite.php?ts=4766


    Only dead fish swim with the stream.
    Don't discuss with idiots. They only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience there.


    This is ten percent luck,
    Twenty percent skill,
    Fifteen percent concentrated power of will,
    Five percent pleasure,
    Fifty percent pain,
    And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!

  • This is the complete list of affected CPUs.




    Microsoft announced that especially server platforms have to see massive performance cuts. Microsoft would make such an announcement if they didnt do tests... so its pretty much what will happen to the server structure worldwide.


    First reports of users are coming in which applied the new patches dealing with this issue and their Overclocking profiles turned instable. Other users reported about increasing CPU temperatures.
    To be honest I am not surprised by that at all.
    The patch adds two new steps to security relevant kernel call. That means for the same work the CPU has to do more work. That requires more energy and more energy means more heat on the CPU.
    The increasing CPU temperatures are a direct result of this "fix/patch".
    Increasing CPU temperatures also lead to overclocking problems even if the temps are not high enough for thermal throttling to step in. The problem here is that CPUs operate best and most effective at low temperatures. If the temperatures are rising then it might happen that there is a current leakage which in result makes the CPU run inefficent and unstable. This can only be compensated by putting even more voltage on the CPU which would increase the temperatures even further and potentially even cause damage to the processor.
    With other words, it is no big surprise that after patching Windows and Linux the temperatures of CPUs are increasing and that OC profiles become unstable (at least under full load).
    Not all CPUs will suffer OC problems... the quality of the silicon chip has a big influence here.


    I am a bit worried about which influence this issue has on world economy.
    Private users and companies all around the globe are forced to patch their PCs and servers at the costs of performance. Some might also have to upgrade other software.
    Not only the performance costs but also the workloads that goes into this issue are going to be immense. There might be a worldwide demand for additional servers to compensate the performance losses. Increasing hardware prices, increasing energy costs, additional costs for the consumers... etc.

    signew.jpg


    cfmoddblogo.png5904.png5904.png
    http://www.moddb.com/scripts/topsite.php?ts=4766


    Only dead fish swim with the stream.
    Don't discuss with idiots. They only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience there.


    This is ten percent luck,
    Twenty percent skill,
    Fifteen percent concentrated power of will,
    Five percent pleasure,
    Fifty percent pain,
    And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!

  • Everyday more information about this issue.
    While Intel still hasnt been transparent about the issue Microsoft was a bit more clear about it.
    The performance drops on Haswell and older CPUs might be significantly higher than on the lastest generation of Intel CPUs.
    Also is there going to be a bigger performance drop on Windows 7 + 8 compared to Windows 10. That is due to old legacy code in the kernel. Considering that Windows 7 already without the patch has a worse performance than Windows 10 simply for the fact that it can only use old drivers and has a worse memeory management but now with the patch reducing the performance even more that could be the death sentense for such old OS.


    Intel over the course of this week went from denying that there are any significant problems and blaming other manufaturers for having the same problems (which is not 100% true) to meanwhile admitting that the performance issues might be more significant on specific hardware constellations. Still there is no clear response from Intel about how bad the situation is and how Intel is going to address these issues.
    The US government meanwhile started to investigate recent stock sales of the Intel CEO (just a few days before the issue went public). The Intel stocks went down by 7% during the past week. Just bad timing or a transaction based on insider knowledge?



    First Cloud services have announced to purchase new hardware from Intel competitors in future.

    signew.jpg


    cfmoddblogo.png5904.png5904.png
    http://www.moddb.com/scripts/topsite.php?ts=4766


    Only dead fish swim with the stream.
    Don't discuss with idiots. They only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience there.


    This is ten percent luck,
    Twenty percent skill,
    Fifteen percent concentrated power of will,
    Five percent pleasure,
    Fifty percent pain,
    And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!